Mortgage Mortgage Lender Mortgage Mortgage Lender Mortgage Mortgage Lender

Rtgage Rate Mortagagemortgagelender Lender Szh 3 Blog 2011 3 14ddfbc42cf0c281cc56cca8ba41432d0d1d8aa1 Mortgage Mortgage Lender Band of Investment - Real Estate Valuation

Rtgage Rate Mortagagemortgagelender Lender Szh 3 Blog 2011 3 14ddfbc42cf0c281cc56cca8ba41432d0d1d8aa1 Mortgage Mortgage Lender

, although it has a significant impact upon the investor's return. The Financing Component accounts for the investor's annual cost, but does not consider the return of principal sometime in the future.

Rtgage e Rate odsearch searchh Rtgage 0tu 14ddfbc42cf0c281cc56cca8ba41432d0d1d8aa1 trsearch searchf Rtgage t 14ddfbc42cf0c281cc56cca8ba41432d0d1d8aa1 esearchBnsearch 2011 fsearchI Szh v Blog ssearchmsearchnsearch a 2011 ssearchmsearchs Szh thsearchtsearchbsearcht Rate tsearcheF Szh n 2011 nsearchisearchg Szh Blog o 14ddfbc42cf0c281cc56cca8ba41432d0d1d8aa1 psearchnnsearch searchnsearch 14ddfbc42cf0c281cc56cca8ba41432d0d1d8aa1 h Mortagagemortgagelender Rate q Blog i Lender y Lender C Lender m 2011 osearche Rate t Lender ex Rate s0 i Rate Rtgage er Rate e 2011 usearchtsearch. Szh T Blog a Rate 14ddfbc42cf0c281cc56cca8ba41432d0d1d8aa1 s,searchtsearchesearchm Lender rtsearchasearche Blog pay 2011 e Szh tsearch Blog e Blog e Rate e Rtgage d Lender an Rtgage Rate hesearchi 2011 v Blog s Szh orn 2011 vsearchr se Mortagagemortgagelender lsearch searchhe 2011 proerty.searchThe Rate fo Lender mr Mortagagemortgagelender as Mortagagemortgagelender u 14ddfbc42cf0c281cc56cca8ba41432d0d1d8aa1 p Mortagagemortgagelender i Mortagagemortgagelender n i Lender err Lender n 14ddfbc42cf0c281cc56cca8ba41432d0d1d8aa1 oussearch Th Mortagagemortgagelender m0rsearchgg Blog a 14ddfbc42cf0c281cc56cca8ba41432d0d1d8aa1 m Lender ntsensearch isearch 0 yea Rtgage ssearchin the above example. The second assumption is unrealistic. The investor will sell the property at sometime in the future. Or his heirs will inherit it.

A layman's example
Suppose that you purchase a car for $10,000 and finance the entire amount for a term of four years. You make payments for four years and assume that no more payments are due. The loan has been paid off and you can start to put the extra cash in your pocket. Right? But on the first of 49th. month, you receive a letter from the bank stating that loan payments are expected to be made for as long as you own the car.

Or assume that you decide to sell the car at the end of four years, but when you request that the bank release the title, the bank demands a payment of $10,000. Their explanation is: "Sorry, but we don't take into consideration the principal portion of your loan payments. You still owe $10,000."

This is how the Band of Investment handles the Financing Component. Although giving the appearance of accuracy, it does not correctly reflect financing and it produces erroneous results.
Equity Component - Misleading and Incorrect
The Equity Yield Rate is, by implication, analogous to the investor's rate of return, or Internal Rate of Return. It is commonly used to represent the investor's rate of return by both bankers and real estate professionals who are not thoroughly informed on the subject. The Equity Yield Rate is not the same as the Internal Rate of Return or the Investor's Return on Equity. It must not be compared to the published rates of other investment vehicles; e.g. the Annual Percentage Rate of savings accounts or mortgage loans, bond yields, annuity yields, etc.

The Equity Yield Rate is the investor's annual Cash on Cash Yield - the funds available to the investor after mortgage payments divided by his original Equity Portion of the investment. And this is only true if Net Income from the property is assumed to be constant; i.e. does not increase or decrease each year. And this is only true until the mortgage loan is paid off, at which time the annual Cash on Cash Yield goes up substantially.

The cash on cash yield is an important consideration to the investor. He needs to know that there will be a positive cash flow after mortgage payments are made. But his required cash on cash yield will vary, depending upon the property. It should not be compared to other market interest rates or to the cash on cash yield requirements that were observed for other real property.

For example, let's take two office buildings that are identical in all respects, except for the local market area. Market Area 1 is a suburban growth area where rents have been observed to be increasing each year. Market Area 2 is an urban market where rents are not expected to change. Common sense (and mathematical algorithms) tell us that the investor will accept a lower cash on cash yield (Equity Yield Rate) in Market Area 1 because he knows that his income will be increasing each year, resulting in an overall rate of return (IRR) that is higher than his initial cash on cash yield. The Band of Investment cannot account for this change in income.

A layman's example
Suppose that you are offered two investment alternatives. The first will pay you $1,000 per year for 10 years. The second will pay you $1,000 in the first year and the payment will go up by 1% per year in each of the next nine years. Which investment produces the highest rate of return for you? Which one will you choose? Obviously the second alternative is the best. But the Band of Investment calculation cannot tell you that and cannot quantify the difference.

Investment Analyst - The Advanced Mortgage Equity Technique

Mortgage equity analysis has evolved over many years. It is a mathematical technique used to calculate the value of an investment, based upon a specified yield requirement. As the name suggests, financing is one of the factors which is considered in the calculation. The method is applied extensively when analyzing real estate investments, which very often are highly leveraged, because it recognizes the impact that financing has on the investor's expected yield. However, even when there are no borrowed funds, the technique is effective in estimating the value of an investment.

It is beyond the scope of this discussion to describe the The Advanced Mortgage Equity Techique in depth, but this technique properly considers both the Financing Component and the Equity Component of an investment because it considers all of the factors that are ignored in the Band of Investment. Factors considered are:
Analyst enables you to calculate the true IRR to the investor. To illustrate the difference between the Band of Investment and the Mortgage Equity Technique, we offer a simple comparsion using the same information that is used in the Band of Investment calculations above.

Loan to Value Ratio: 75%
Mortgage Rate: 7.5%
Term of Loan: 20 years-paid monthly
Required IRR: 10%
Cash Equity Percentage: 25% (100% - 75% LTV)
Holding Period: 10 years

We specify a holding period, which cannot be done in the Band of Investment. We also have changed the reference to the Required Equity Yield Rate. It is now the Required IRR and reflects the true rate of return to the investor. The calculation is as follows:

Financing Component - Rate Attributable to Loan (.0967 x .75) = 0.072503
Equity Component .10 x .25 = 0.025000
Equivalent Band of Investment Rate 0.097503
Less Equity Build-up 0.015122
Indicated Capitalization Rate 0.082382

Note the difference in the final capitalization rates. The Band of Investment indicates 9.7503% and the Mortgage Equity Technique indicates 8.2382%. If we assume an annual net income of $10,000, the value by the Band of Investment would be $102,560 and the value using the Mortgage Equity Technique would be $121,386 - an $18,826 difference or 18.36%.

So How Do We Reconcile This Difference?
Let us assume that we already independently know the value of the property. It is $102,560. Can we conclude that the Band of Investment calculation is correct? The math is correct and it produces the correct value. But it tells us nothing about the investor's Rate of Return - only the Equity Yield Rate or the Cash on Cash Yield.

The actual IRR is 14.7957% ! We can verify this by re-calculating the Mortgage Equity Technique.

Financing Component - Rate Attributable to Loan (.0967 x .75) = 0.072503
Equity Component (14.7957 x .25) = 0.036989
Equivalent Band of Investment Rate 0.109492
Less Equity Build-up 0.011989
Indicated Capitalization Rate 0.097504


Alternatively, let us assume that in fact an investor will accept an IRR of 10% for the particular property that is being analyzed. Then the Band of Investment is significantly underestimating the value of the property. If the Required IRR is 10%, the Capitalization Rate is 8.2382% and the Indicated Value is $121,386, not $102,560.

Theory Versus Practice
In theory, the development of the capitalization rate is supposed to lead to a conclusion of value. In practice, the analyst using the Band of Investment independently determines the value by observing sales of similar properties and/or their cap rates. Then he "backs into" the Equity Yield Rate in order to calculate the cap rate of his property and make the math work. It is the only way that he can do it because he only rarely can go into the market and observe other published "equity yield rates." As discussed extensively above, equity yield rates vary from property to property and one cannot use the rates of other investment vehicles for comparison because they represent actual rates of return and not cash on cash yields.
tRtgage Rate Mortagagemortgagelender Lender Szh 3 Blog 2011 3 14ddfbc42cf0c281cc56cca8ba41432d0d1d8aa1 Mortgage Mortgage Lender Band of Investment - Real Estate Valuationt i Mortgage Mortgage Lender Mortgage Mortgage Lender Investments yRtgage Rate Mortagagemortgagelender Lender Szh 3 Blog 2011 3 14ddfbc42cf0c281cc56cca8ba41432d0d1d8aa1 Mortgage Mortgage Lender Band of Investment - Real Estate Valuationy u Mortgage Mortgage Lender